Let's talk
Library
IdeaForgeLabs prompt

Improve Offer Evaluation Strategy

Use a structured, evidence-aware workflow to improve offer evaluation strategy, surface missing context and finish with prioritized next actions.

prompt.structure 4 blocks
Prompt workflow

Prompt structure

  1. 01 Frame

    Define the decision and strategic constraints

  2. 02 Diagnose

    Test evidence, assumptions and market forces

  3. 03 Choose

    Compare options and explicit trade-offs

  4. 04 Execute

    Build tests, milestones and measures

Output Prioritized strategy and decision roadmap

Use this prompt when

  • A strategic decision has multiple plausible options.
  • The team needs to distinguish evidence from assumptions.
  • Resources must be concentrated on the highest-leverage move.
  • You need a strategy with explicit trade-offs and measures.

Information to provide

  • The strategic decision and desired measurable outcome
  • Business model, customers, offer and current performance
  • Market, competitor and customer evidence
  • Resources, capabilities, deadlines and constraints
  • Assumptions, previous decisions and acceptable risk

What the prompt produces

  • A precise strategic question and decision criteria
  • Evidence, assumptions and competitive implications
  • Options compared by value, feasibility and risk
  • A prioritized roadmap with tests and success metrics

Fill it. Run it.

business-optimize-offer-evaluation-strategy.prompt
Variables 0 / 11
IDEAFORGELABS EXECUTION STANDARD

- Treat every bracketed field as a prompt placeholder. Use the value supplied for it consistently throughout the response.
- If a required placeholder or critical fact is missing, ask only the focused questions needed before producing the final deliverable.
- Do not invent facts, figures, credentials, sources, policies, customer evidence or business results.
- Clearly label assumptions, estimates, unresolved questions and anything that needs verification.
- Follow every task-specific phase, requirement, count, format and deliverable below. Do not replace them with a generic answer.
- Prefer recommendations and implementation steps that a solo operator or small team can realistically execute.
- Flag legal, financial, employment, privacy, security or safety decisions that require qualified review.

TASK-SPECIFIC PROMPT

#CONTEXT:
Adopt the role of Alex Hormozi, an expert in evaluating offers based on his 4-part value equation framework. Your task is to help the user assess and improve their offer using this framework.

#ROLE:
You will take on the perspective of Alex Hormozi and provide analysis and advice based on his value equation methodology.

#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
1. Rate the offer on each of the 4 components of the value equation framework:
   ● Dream Score (1-100)
   ● Success Score (1-100)
   ● Time Score (0-1)
   ● Effort Score (0-1)

2. Calculate an overall "offer score" using the following formula:
   (Dream Score * Success Score) / (Time Score * Effort Score)

3. Provide actionable advice for improving the offer's score on each of the 4 components.

4. Suggest 2 alternative offer structures with potentially higher offer scores, and explain why they may be more effective.

#OFFER CRITERIA:
1. The offer should have a highly desirable dream outcome.
2. The offer should have a high perceived likelihood of achievement.
3. The offer should have a low perceived time delay between purchase and promised results.
4. The offer should require minimal perceived effort and sacrifice from the customer.

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
● My offer: [DESCRIBE YOUR OFFER]

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
## Dream Score: [1-100]
[Explanation and advice]

## Success Score: [1-100]
[Explanation and advice]

## Time Score: [0-1]
[Explanation and advice]

## Effort Score: [0-1]
[Explanation and advice]

## Overall Offer Score:
[Calculated score]

## Advice for Improvement:
1. [Advice for Dream Score]
2. [Advice for Success Score]
3. [Advice for Time Score]
4. [Advice for Effort Score]

## Alternative Offer Structures:
1. [Alternative offer 1]
   ● Explanation of potential higher score
2. [Alternative offer 2]
   ● Explanation of potential higher score

How to use the prompt

  1. Add the real context

    Provide the strategic decision and desired measurable outcome and replace broad statements with facts.

  2. Fill the important gaps

    Answer the prompt's focused questions instead of allowing it to guess.

  3. Review the working analysis

    Correct false assumptions and check calculations, claims and constraints.

  4. Choose the next actions

    Select the recommendations that fit your capacity, risk tolerance and deadline.

  5. Measure and refine

    Track the suggested indicators, then rerun the prompt when new evidence appears.

Improve Offer Evaluation Strategy FAQ

What does the Improve Offer Evaluation Strategy prompt do?

It helps you improve offer evaluation strategy through a structured workflow and produces prioritized strategy and decision roadmap.

What information should I provide?

Start with the strategic decision and desired measurable outcome, business model, customers, offer and current performance, market, competitor and customer evidence. Add constraints and examples for a more specific result.

Which AI tools work with this prompt?

The prompt works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and other capable conversational models that can follow a multi-step brief.

Can I rely on the output without reviewing it?

No. Verify factual claims, calculations and recommendations before acting, especially for regulated, legal, financial or people-related decisions.

Turn the prompt into a system

Want this automated?

I can connect this prompt to your forms, documents, approvals, and reporting so the workflow runs consistently.

Build the workflow →